Danske Bank; Wake up and Smell the Internet.

Why is it that my Danish Bank, Danske Bank, is so difficult to log in to?

My UK banks, Lloyds TSB and Santander, can both be used on any browser (or at least Chrome, Firefox and IE), and although I need two different codes, both a mix of numbers and letters, logging on is as easy as pie; enter your codes, click the button, Bob’s your uncle and Fanny’s your aunt – you’re in.

So far, my experience with Danske Bank, could not be further from this.

I started out with having to download Internet Explorer, as I had received, for some reason, an option called a ‘e-Safekey’ which meant that I could only log in through that browser. I hate IE, it gave my computer a lot of problems, so after complaining on Twitter, I was thrilled to see Danske Bank tweeting me, and telling me that I could use any browser! So I opened a tab in Firefox, but still….no log on. Eventually I was told that to log on in other browsers, I’d have to use their other log in option, an ‘ActivCard’. OK…..

So I orderd one of those.

Have you seen that? It’s exactly like a mini-calculator that I have to carry with me ALL the time if I want to log on using any other browser other than IE. I have to enter my code, the mini-calculator then gives me a one-time code which I then have to enter, and then finally I’m in.

Seriously, Danske Bank. It’s 2010. Why on EARTH do I have to actually carry something around with me to access my ONLINE banking? It’s absolutely absurd!

I just can not understand it, and it drives me mad.

Why can’t I just use the same codes in differen browsers? Give me a good and just reason why, and I’ll shut up, but until then; sort it the f*ck out.

ARGH!

Comments {4}

Mac or Dell; That is the Question.

Alright. I really need help, and I’m hoping that people on Twitter, Facebook and the general web will be willing to give me some tips and advice, preferable ‘proper’ advice, as opposed to just telling me to ‘get a Mac’ or ‘Mac sucks’. I know how loyal both the camps are, but let’s try to be detailed about the reasons.

So I need a new computer, or new laptop, I should say. I don’t need a notebook or a Mac Air, just a ‘normal’ laptop.

The reason it’s between Dell and Mac is because I have access to discounts at Dell, and (and this is one of the main reasons I’ve always had Dell) I can get Word, Photoshop, PowerPoint, anti-virus programme and all that jazz installed for free. Needless to say, a pretty sweet deal. I also like Dell’s OS, and their computers in general.

I had a Mac once, sorted of forced into getting it, so never got off on the right foot with it. Hated the OS; hated that it was all so ‘cute’ and ’rounded’ and hated the ‘dock’ concept.  I’m not the biggest fan of Apple full-stop really, especially recently as they try to cling on to their small, innovative company reputation, when they are anything but. Also, I hate Steve Job’s dress sense – does the man wear anything other than slacks and tucked in polo necks?! However, I am open to changed, and open to try again. My girlfriend has a Mac, which I haven’t thrown out the window yet, and I’m constantly hearing about how good they are etc etc.

Anyway. I know that Macs are good computers. So are Dell. I know it comes down to what you use them for (as well as personal preference),  but before I tell you what I use them for and what I like, I’ll go over what I’m using so far….

Dell Inspiron 6400

  • Processor: Core Solo 1.66 GHz
  • Installed Memory: 512 MB (DDR2 SDRAM)
  • Display: 15.4 in. WXGA TFT Active Matrix
  • Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
  • Weight 2.8 kg
  • Processor Manufacturer: Intel
  • Processor Type: Core Solo
  • Processor Speed: 1.66 GHz
  • Bus Speed: 667 MHz
  • Installed RAM: 512 MB
  • RAM Technology: DDR2 SDRAM
  • Max Supported RAM: 2 GB
  • RAM Speed: 533 MHz
  • Installed Cache Memory: 2048 KB
  • Hard Drive Capacity: 60 GB
  • Hard Drive Rotation Speed: 5,400 RPM
  • Storage Controller Type: Serial ATA
  • CD / DVD Type: CD-RW/DVD-ROM
  • Optical Drive Read Speed: 24x (CD) • 8x (DVD)
  • Optical Drive Write Speed: 24x (CD)
  • Optical Drive ReWrite Speed: 10x (CD-RW)
  • Display Tech: WXGA TFT Active Matrix
  • Screen Size: 15.4 in.
  • Display Max. Resolution: 1280 x 800
  • Graphic Processor: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
  • Audio Output Type: Headphones, sound card, speaker(s)
  • Audio Input Type: Microphone

So that’s what I’m using.

This is what I want, in much less techy language….

  • I’m happy with the weight of my laptop, I rarely take it anywhere, but obviously lighter would hardly be a problem
  • I love my screen size, only similar or larger
  • More RAM and memory would be nice. Right now, I have everything I can have on external HDs, partly as I’m scared my laptop is about to bite the dust, partly as I don’t have enough memory, and partly because it’s slow enough as it is (and I do defrag it, Spybot it, clean it etc often)
  • Hate my media centre, but then, never use it, just stick to DivX or similar
  • Happy with my speakers. Didn’t write home about them, but they’re decent
  • Was very happy with processor speed, but now it’s shit. No doubt (and I don’t really know my stuff) this is a combination of age of computer and age of processor (in terms of that now there is a much better one out there)
  • I really like the OS – probably as I’m very used to it, but as said, happy to change. Maybe.
  • Programmes I use often are Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Photoshop, ImageReady, InDesign, BitTorrent, er, I think that’s it
  • I don’t use my computer for any massive design projects, music or movie projects
  • I do use the net. A lot. A LOT.
  • A built in camera is nice, but by no means a prereq
  • Design is important, but I don’t need curvy edges and little gentle sounds to make me ‘like’ my computer. I can appreciate hard lines just as much as soft. I also don’t need things to be one block of colour, although white, black, red, purple – they’re all pretty
  • I’m not concerned about belonging to a certain ‘group’ or ‘tribe’ to use our 21st century lingo. I actually try to get away from the Mac lot, high on their individuality, which is so incredibly ironic I can’t begin to discuss it. But then I’m tried of being dismissed as some sad, grey, loser who is too ‘something’ (although what, I’m not entirely sure) to not have a Mac. Apple and Dell/PC are both gigantic, fat-cat, loaded corporations, so I don’t really mind which I get segmented as in the end.

Hmmm.  That’s all that comes to mind right now. In a nutshell; I’m not a designer, programmer, musician or movie-maker. I don’t need VAST amounts of graphics etc, but do want something powerful that will keep going for a while. I’ve had this Dell for about 5/6 years now, and it’s only really recently that it’s definitely – definitely – showing signs of age. I’ve had a new HD and had it taken in for a good clean up and service. I’ve taken it apart in to 8 bits and hoovered them all. My keys are shiny, there are dull patches where I rest my hands. I get random warning boxes that pop up for no apparent reason and I’m tired of it all (although it certainly is loved).

I want and need a new computer. Please help.

Comments {27}

iPad – Game Changer of What Game?

No big news to those who know me, but I’m not an Apple fan, so the fact that I’m once again bitching about Apple products is nothing new.

Anyway. The iPad. The most exciting thing since, well….I’m not really sure. Fan-boys went mental, they sold XXX in 2 seconds, people rioting, women flaunting themselves, men weeping, Steve still wearing goddamn slacks with his bloody polo neck tucked in (seriously, Steve!); it was your usual Apple launch.

It’s been and still is being heralded as a ‘game changer’, but not only do I not believe it, I can’t quite figure out what game it is changing.

Firstly, I don’t believe it will change the game. It is not filling a gap. I don’t think anyone has ever sat there with their laptop and smartphone and thought, “Man. If only I had something bigger than my phone, but smaller than my laptop, that doesn’t quite do all the things either of them does.” Yes, it is good for showing shiny pictures and nice videos, and it’s great for trips and reading books (unless you’re in the bath, in the bus, in a dodgy part of town, eating, etc), yes, it’s great for whipping out and perhaps taking a few notes, but does that really count as ‘filling a gap’? I don’t think so. I think it’s something that is kind of useful, for the right sort of person, but certainly – certainly – not for everyone. I can honestly say I don’t think I will ever, ever get one – or anything similar made by anyone else.

Secondly, and much related to my first point, if it’s not filling a gap, it must be a game changer, right? But, if it’s all so new, and doesn’t quite do what a phone does or what a laptop does, what game is it changing? Some people compare it to when the iPhone was launched, now that was a game changer. It changed the way we see phones. But what is the iPad changing? The Kindle game? I don’t really know if I’d call that a ‘game’, and does one (ish) product really constitute a ‘game’? Again; I don’t think so. I also don’t think that companies will be rushing to product other tablets. Actually, they might, because, you know, Apple is cool so let’s all make one, but I don’t think that the demand will be there. I think the vast – VAST – majority of people are happy with their phone (smart or not smart) and their laptop. It’s few people who can afford a third device to do…..stuff they can already do on, and even fewer who think that it’s necessary.

Perhaps it’s just me and my old fashioned way of thinking, and I will gladly eat my words and my metaphorical hat if in 5 years, I am writing on an iPad-type-thing, and everywhere you go, people are on their phones, online on their iPads, and typing away on their laptops, but, for me, the regular joe, and quite a few others; I’ll just settle for what I’ve got.

Comments {0}

Glastonbury vs. Roskilde

Well it’s been a (really) long time coming, but I’ve finally found a bit of time to write a small post about my experience at Glastonbury this year (Revision after writing; I’m warning you now – this is a long and rambling post).

I’ve thought about it a lot – a LOT – and think that it’s probably for the best that I didn’t write this post straight after the festival, as my head was swimming, and to be honest, just about every other experience I’ve ever had paled in comparison. You might be thinking ‘yeah right, that’s what everyone says’ which is what I would have thought, and in fact what I did think whenever I heard, or read, people’s opinions about the festival.

It seemed as if EVERYONE loved it. The whole of the UK is aware of it (the festival is the third largest city in the South West of England for the week it’s on, so it’s hard to miss really), newspapers cover it in depth, as do radios of course (BBC Radio One have two tents there, as well as their DJs playing), and hours of live footage are broadcast on TV. Trust me when I saw you can’t miss it. I’ve never actually met anyone in Denmark who has heard of it, which surprises me constantly when it’s such a mammoth festival. Anyway.

I once had a ticket back in 1996 (and still do, framed, mint condition), but never went as it rained for 12 hours non-stop just before, and I had no money, no tent, and decided at the last minute that I would sell my ticket, which I never did – thankfully. As the years passed, great acts came and went, and although I often thought of going, the steady increase in price and the pretty much guaranteed crap weather kept putting me off.

Eventually I moved to Denmark, and in 2001, I received a ticket to Roskilde Festival as a birthday present. If you remember correctly, it was (until last year) the hottest year on record. It was mind-blowing. I didn’t get swept away in torrents of rain, the music was fantastic, and although I was at first slightly daunted by the size, I quickly found my way around, as really, it’s not that big. In a nutshell; I loved it.

Around the same time, my brother started attending Glastonbury, and other festivals. He quickly became a die-hard fan of Glasto, and has been on my back ever since to go with him. Again, weather and price just put me off it. I didn’t go to another festival until last year – 2009 – when again, I went to Roskilde (I managed to get a free ticket, otherwise I’m not sure I would have, to be honest). Again, it was the hottest on record, and while I had a completely different experience, it was equally as brilliant, if not more so.

It can’t have been long after I came home that my brother once again started pestering me to go to Glastonbury (If you don’t know, Glastonbury has a very special system for tickets. You first have to register months in advance, sending a photo of yourself. If you’re lucky, you get registered, and have to pay £50. There is a deadline a few months later for you to pay the rest of the ticket price by (total this year was £185), and if you have decided not to go, you can get back £40, so it’s not so bad. Eventually, you receive your ticket – totally unique with photo and ID number. So basically, you have to register I think about 8 months before the festival). He was sending me links to possible line-ups, montages of last year’s festival, telling me stories, showing me photos, and reminding me that 2010 would be the 40th anniversary, so it was bound to be a good one. I thought long and hard about it, and realised that the way my life was going, festivals won’t be as easy to attend soon (Babies? Work? etc), and it was the 40th anniversary, and yes, it would get my dear brother off my back if I just bit the bullet and went. So sod it. I half-hearted logged on to the ticket machine, and refreshed over and over and over for about 3 hours until magically, there I was; registered.

Fast-forward 8 months of uming and ering, and I stood, ticket in hand, ready to go. I kept a close eye on the weather forecast, which wasn’t hard to do as most UK websites have a ‘Glastonbury Weather Watch’, and amazingly; it was set to be a record breaker.

My brother kept trying to get me to go for the whole week, and (regrettably) I said that I would only go from Friday morning, to Sunday evening/Monday early morning. I had read horror stories about arriving and leaving (taking up to 9 hours to leave the car-park on Monday, and just as long to get in on the Wednesday), and was determined to miss it all. So I arrived at 10am Friday morning, and was already overwhelmed by the beauty of South West England, Stone Henge, and the unbelievably amount of cars. Luckily, dear bro (let’s name him; Iain) had given me a map with their camp-site marked on it, and also managed to meet me close to the entrance.

I can’t begin to tell you how massive the place is, but overwhelmed doesn’t even come close to describing my mood. It was probably around 30 degrees, there were people everywhere, and as I looked over the festival site, I realised that I wasn’t in Roskilde any more.

I’m going to try to keep things short, as I know I’ve gone on long enough already. You’ll have to forgive me; sometimes I see this blog as a diary rather than a source of…..entertainment (?) for others!

How to keep it short…. It’s 177,000 people. That hopefully gives an idea of the size. Over twice the size of Roskilde Festival, and just over twice the area. You can’t imagine so many people wandering about. You will not see the same person twice, and you will not see everything there is to see, especially if you go, like I did, from Friday to Sunday.

My biggest regret is that I didn’t go for the whole week; who gives a shit about queueing?! Quite literally, about 3 hours before I left, I was discovering whole new fields – big fields – filled with teepees, tents, people, stalls, and food. There were life-size buildings, art installations (BIG installations like a tube carriage that has smashed through the front of a 6 story building; an real aeroplane that has ‘crash landed’ in a field, bizarre metal sculptures – the list goes on and on), whole little covered villages which you trekked through and ended up in another club; I can’t begin to describe it all. You could easily go and not plan to see a single concert; just walk around, and take it all in.

The only problem was that after walking around such a massive area for so long, getting from one thing to another, dancing, drinking and eating all day (in 30 degree heat), that come 11pm, I was knackered, and of course, that was just when a whole other Glastonbury was getting started. The latest I stayed up was 2am, and when I went to the toilet at 5.30am, not only was it daylight, but it could have been 4 in the afternoon; people everywhere. Extremely disorientating!

Come Sunday (England infamous defeat in the World Cup), I had to take a break. I sat in my tent, drank water, and just tried to gather my thoughts. To be honest, right then, I was exhausted. Mentally and physically. My head was completely saturated with things I had seen, music I had heard, smells, people, and emotions. My body drained of energy by the constant heat, the constant moving, and the lack of total peace and quiet. I was looking forward to going home, I can’t lie.

In hindsight, I wasn’t prepared. I’m not sure anyone is when they first go. It can’t be explained. It really is a phenomenon. It’s a world apart from anything I’ve ever experienced, and I realise that it can’t be compared to Roskilde, but I’ll come to that in a bit.

I left, late Sunday evening, and was home by 1am. I showered, and fell into my bed at my parent’s house. It took me a long time to really realise what an experience it was, and how daft I was to have missed the first 3 days, not only to explore, but to adjust! I had leapt in to my first Glastonbury blindfolded, on the day it all kicks off. If I had to give one piece of advice to Glastonbury virgins; go for the whole week. Explore and adjust. Trust me.

That said and done, I can cover the music! The full line-up is here, but from what I can remember…..these are the acts I saw:

Rolf Harris, The Stranglers, Hot Chip, Mariachi El Bronx, Mumford and Sons, Ellie Goulding, Broken Bells, The xx, Beardyman, Nneka, Muse, The National, Reef, Coheed and Cambria, I Blame Coco, Paloma Faith, Nora Jones, Faithless, Temper Trap, Grizzly Bear, Kelis and Miike Snow.

I have no doubt at all that I have left some out. No doubt. Sometimes I remember acts I saw, but forget them just as quickly. But the best I remember of course. They were The xx, Mumford and Sons, Beardyman, and Muse.

Beardyman played at Arcadia; something that can not be explained, and this video does not do it justice, but it’s all I have;

Beardyman at Arcadia 2010

The xx blew me away, although I’m not sure why. They were incredible live, but I think it was the atmosphere in the tent. Moved to tears.

The other band that made water come out of my eyes was Mumford and Sons who were so clearly overwhelmed by the number of people and the response they received. It was an unforgettable concert, and I hope so very much I can see them again soon.

Muse, of course, were headlining on the Pyramid Stage (the one permanent structure of the festival). They were, as you might expect, almighty. I knew it was going to be good, but I did not realise just how good. See them if you get the chance.

There were many other bands I wish I had seen, as it always goes at festivals. Yet, there is just no way – especially at Glastonbury – that you can see them all. Frustrating sometimes, but it all works out fine. There is so much to see, that occasionally you find yourself stuck in The Tiny Tea Tent, and not down raving at Annie Mac. But it’s OK. Because it’s Glastonbury, and that’s exactly what it’s all about.

There were a few things that occurred to me over the weekend, a few things that made Glastonbury even more different from Roskilde. There were;

Dry trees – yes, at Glastonbury, despite having 177,000 people there, so let’s say approximately 88,500 men, you could quite happily slide down a tree, or post, or boarding, and no be smothered in piss. There is an incredibly effective self-policing system, and men peeing anywhere other than a urinal is a no-go. It left me flabbergasted. They just don’t do it, which is a welcome relief from Roskilde, where you see more penises in one hour than the average hooker does in a week. Not to mention the stink of piss…

No camp-site parties – I’m not sure if this is a result of the size, and never-ending amount of things to see and do, but camp-site parties don’t exist. Maybe a few, but nothing – nothing – like the kind you get at Roskilde. I know that this is part of the festival, but man, to some people, it’s just a pain the arse. Sorry.

No noise when you slept – no camp-site parties is one thing, but the sheer size of the festival area meant that you quite literally couldn’t hear the music when you slept. I used ear-plugs, but that was because our site was next to a path, and people did not stop walking up and down it. It was amazing.

So there you have it.

No, I didn’t compare the festivals really. But as I said; you can’t. It’s like comparing Århus to New York. Or Uckfield to London. It just can’t be done. Yes it might ‘only’ be just over twice the size, but it’s what you do with it that counts, right? Roskilde is amazing – don’t get me wrong. I love it. I do, but it just can’t be compared.

I would love to hear from anyone else who has been to both, and has anything to say.

I apologise for the rambling of this post. It’s a hard thing to write. I should have written it sooner, but it’s been a very, very busy year, and apparently isn’t slowing down.

To end, I’d like to give Glastonbury a big, fat thumbs-up. Go. Pay the money (virtually the same cost as Roskilde, just sayin). Go for the week. Suck it in. Breath it in. Experience it. Get lost on purpose – you can only get so lost. Eat different meals every day. Drink different drinks every day. Speak to and see different people everyday. It’s an entire city, self-policing, full of music, full of sights, full of experiences, full of energy, and full of love. Seriously.

My photos – which don’t do it justice at all – can be found here.

Glastonbury, I love you.

Comments {0}

Another New Blog?

After….well not very long of having my ‘new’ blog here at WordPress, it looks like I might be moving on again.

I left Eblogger as everyone I knew was on WordPress, you could do more with it, and I wanted to merge my website and blog together, which I never actually got around to doing. However, that is because of a very busy schedule recently – not because I couldn’t figure it out. Wait, I’m lying; it’s also because I couldn’t figure it out.

Now I know it’s meant to be extremely easy, but I am not a good person when it comes to computers and anything to do with any kind of code. Sure, I made my own website, but that was using FrontPage, and that is incredibly easy to do. I kept arranging to meet up with someone who very kindly agreed to help me, but kept cancelling on him as I realised I just didn’t have time. In the end, I said that it’d have to wait until I had time, which would be at some point in the future. Maybe.

Anyway, I recently watched a YouTube video of Dan 3.0 via Mashable, where I heard about SquareSpace. Being curious I checked it out, and must admit, it looks incredibly easy. Yes, you have to pay – not much at all – but to be honest, paying is actually something I would do for full control of my site (remember; me + code = forget-about-it). Having watched the little intro video, read about it online, and seen comparisons between WordPress and SquareSpace, I do believe I’m going to move my blog. Again. It just looks too easy, and the comparisons pretty much work out evenly, the sole difference being that SquareSpace is good for those who really are crap at things involving code, etc. That’s me. I know it comes down to your own preferences most of the time, and SquareSpace seems to suit mine.

That said, I have no idea when I’ll swap. Maybe one weekend when it’s raining and I am giving myself a break from the thesis. Who knows. I just thought I’d share.

Comments {0}

The Curse of the :)

I know I should really be over this, given that I’ve been emailing and texting and generally ‘in touch’ with all forms of electronic communication for some time now, but I still misread emails.

I still find myself getting upset and annoyed with the sender as if they’ve purposely insulted me, even if their email is perfectly polite. I don’t remember this ever happening with those things….what were they now? Pen and paper…..oh yeah; letters. I don’t think I ever used any form of smilely face until not that long ago – I didn’t use them on my first ventures online (in some obscure music forum if I remember correctly), and certainly not in my first emails. For a long time I didn’t like to use them – and still don’t to some extent – but sometimes, it’s almost necessary.

I ask myself every day whether or not the person I’m writing to will know that I’m joking or not, and maybe 7 times out of 10, that person really knows me, so knows that it’s a joke, and if they’re not sure, they’re sure enough of our friendship to call me on it, and ask WTF?!

I know of countless times people have ended up in fights due to a misunderstood text or email. I suppose it’s because we’re quick to send them and they’re quick to be received. There’s no real ‘thought’ behind them, e.g. ‘How should I phrase this so there is no misunderstanding?’ I don’t recall ever thinking that when I wrote letters, but perhaps it was more automatic?

Despite the fact that I’m used to texts and emails, they can still come across – because I receive them so quickly – as instant replies, and if they’re not structured ‘correctly’ I interpret it as a thoughtless reply. I tend to think of mine as speech, as in, ‘Would I say this to their face?’ Of course in that situation, you have your face with which to convey emotions, which brings me back to our friend Acid, I mean smilely face.

Perhaps it’s just me, but I still have problems reading things, and I still think quite a lot before sending emails. Especially if I hope to build/maintain a relationship with the person on the other end.

Anyway. This was just a morning ramble. Perhaps I should think more before I blog. Who knows.

Comments {0}

To Vote, or Not to Vote.

So as most people know, a general election is fast approaching in the UK. About time too; a feeling shared by many, I should think.

If I lived in the UK, I’d be looking forward to May 6th and the chance to actually make a change, with hope in my heart and the thrill of the vote (as silly as that might sound). However, I find myself torn with this election. I don’t live in the UK. I haven’t done for just over 7 years. I have no connection with the country (other than family and so forth).

Should I vote?

‘Of course!’ say some, it’s my duty, I’m a woman, never mind that; I’m able to vote and I should use it. Too true, too true. The thought of wasting my vote is nasty, and I hate that I’m even considering it.

But why should I? Why should I have the right (albeit a very small one) to help make a decision that will bring about some serious changes in a country I don’t even live in? For my family? For my friends and other loved ones? I know for a fact I wouldn’t vote the same as some of them, so where does that leave it? There’s some mong in the country who probably isn’t going to vote because they forget, are too lazy/hungover/drunk/high/whatever, so in effect, I’m taking their vote; and where’s the good in that?

I just can’t make up my mind. Vote for a change when I’ll never see it? Or vote because I think the country needs change – regardless of whether I live in it or not?

What to do…..

Comments {2}

Alice on the iPad; When Technology Kills Imagination

So we have the iPad. Like it or loathe it, it’s everywhere. Not a single day has gone by since the launch where I don’t read a tweet about it, or see a link on Facebook, or an article in some online paper or magazine. It’s all over the place. This isn’t a post about the iPad though (there are really enough of those), although the iPad was really the last straw in making me write this post. Actually, it was a video. This one;


And then this article, “I don’t have an iPad, but watching this amazing video demonstrating the Alice in Wonderland app made me want to run out and get one — and if I had a young child, it would make me want to get one even faster…So is this the future of e-books — every book its own app?

Good God I hope not. I just can’t think of a quicker imagination killer than that. Don’t get me wrong; I see the plus sides. It’s incredible technology, and for (dare I say it) grown-ups – or those who have read the book and can see the technology for what it is – it’s a fantastical trip (almost literally), and experience to see the book bought to life like that. But remember when you first read Lord of the Rings – or any book made in to a film. Remember how the characters built up in your head, how they looked, sounded, how the surroundings looked, perhaps even smelt. Then remember when you saw the film and were either blown away (as I was) by how uncannily accurate it was to how you imagined it, or how things didn’t really add up, and the disappointment you felt.

What do you think children mostly do today, or in the future? Watch LOTR or read the entire thing? I’m guessing watch it. But now their visions of Middle Earth, of Gollum, of The Battle of Pelennor, the Elves – everything – it’s all essentially Peter Jacksons. Not a bad vision no, but it’s not theirs.

If apps become standard for books, then where does that leave a child’s imagination? The barrage of TV, films, and computer games are bad enough. How often do children take their self-made Lego inventions and sit in the garden, carrying out a full on attack against the King of the Swamp, while dodging attacks from the air by a modified jumbo-jet? Toys today come so fully prepared (batteries included), that imagination goes as far as the on switch. Every possible action is preprogrammed and children sit back and watch it. No wonder toys are disposed of so quickly when there’s no chance of actual, and this might sound crazy, but actual play.

Call me old fashioned, but I desperately want my children to grow up reading a book and building it in their heads. I want them to be overjoyed or heartbroken (yes, I’m that mean) when they see the film adaptation of their favourite book and see someone else’s take on it. I want them to make bows and arrows and throw sticks at each other, pretending they’re cowboys or G.I Joe or whoever the hell they want to be; Jesus, for all I care. What I really don’t want is for someone else who I’ve never met to dictate my children’s take on a story. I don’t want my child to grow up thinking that if it hasn’t got an on button, or flashing lights and manic sounds, then it must be boring.

How do we expect children who are brought up this way to cope in later life? How on earth is having everything served out on a plate, neatly packaged, 100% safe, on/off, no loose parts, going to help? What happens when they actually have to deal with a real-life situation that calls for either experience or an imaginative solution?

I know I’m ranting, but it’s a topic I feel very strongly about, and it does really worry me.

I’m all for technology. But I’m more for imagination. Our imagination can kick technology’s arse. And that’s a fact. I’m now going to show that I have no imagination and quote some other people here, who I think say what I mean quite well.

Personally, I would sooner have written Alice in Wonderland than the whole Encyclopedia Britannica.
Stephen Leacoc

Anyone who can be replaced by a machine deserves to be.
Dennis Gunton

I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free.
Michelangelo

It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.
Lewis Carrol

I believe in the imagination.  What I cannot see is infinitely more important than what I can see.
Duane Michals



Comments {0}

Easter 2010 in Food and Other Stuff.

Yes, another Easter has passed. Another large gathering of the family in order to consume vast amounts of food and alcohol. Another Poisoning was attempted by my Mother (her most fruitful was on my Granny’s 80th birthday, when a batch of mussels caused all but 3 members (out of 15) of the family to spend most of the night and following day on the toilet. How the healthy of us laughed. We all do now actually. This time, 1 went down on the Saturday, and so far I can confirm another 4 down. I might laugh, but it is tinged with nerves.

Anyhow. This Easter was particulary notable for three reasons. First; the Poisoning. Not always a given, hence the mirth when it occurs. Secondly; the announcement of a pregnancy! Fantastic news! Third; a neighbour’s 50th birthday celebrations meant that we (the house being on the top of a big ol’ hill) had the best view of his ‘present’ – a 10 minute display by a Spitfire! Video and photos are below – I know it’s just what you were wondering…. I’ve always had a thing about Spitfires, and always wanted to see one in action, so to speak, and while we sat, drinking tea, doing jigsaw puzzles, and reading the papers, there came an almightly noise. I honestly thought that a plane was coming down it was so loud and guttural. We rushed to the window and saw the unmistakable shape of a Spitfire twisting around, and heading behind the house. In a blind rush everyone ran outside, drinks still in hands, and stood in the slowing rain, gazing upwards. It was a fantastic 10 minutes. Here’s the photo to prove it.

Have you ever seen a more goofy looking group of people? See the first victim of the Poisoning peering meekly out of the top right window? That, my friends, is how exciting this was :) See for youselves….


Anyway. Enough. Let us talk food. Let us look at food. Incidentally, I just heard that another 5 members of the family have gone down with the Poisoning. We think it was the salmon, which I decided not to eat for some reason.

There was a lot of food, as usual, and here, for your viewing pleasure, and some of the highlights…..mmmm.

Flour, condensed milk, sugar, desiccated coconut becomes…….

Coconut ice – fat free…..ish.

Amazing ginger and macadamia nut cookies made by my cousin. They went very quickly.

Guess?

Ham!

Cooked ham!

Ready to eat ham!

Can’t have it without…..

It was the best ham I’ve ever had, without a doubt….

Bread and butter pudding, with hot cross buns instead of bread. My Mother has her genius moments….

Breakfast fit for kings!

Homemade Easter eggs

That looked really weird on the inside.

This pudding, was supposed to look like the one on the magazine page….

Still, tasted pretty good; while chocolate and cream topping, on rhubarb and sponge.

A Spitfire!

Spot the Spitfire!

The hunt begins….

Subtle, no?

The cat on the look out.

The spoils of the hunt. Mostly beer..hmm.

The hen herding begins.

Herding hens isn’t something we do every year, I’d like to add.

Beautiful salads and Mini Eggs.

Very gooey cheese.

Enough sausages. Even for me.

Same goes for eggs.

God is a big breakfast good sometimes.

That was it. Or rather, a small selection of it. Call me mad – I love pictures of food.

Comments {4}

The Inevitability of the ACTA.

So there’s a blog post I’ve been meaning to write for a while now, and I’m taking the opportunity of me being ill (or at the end – hopefully – of my illness), and spending yet another day on the sofa, to gently write it. God knows how it’ll turn out, as it could quite easily get out of hand, and probably should be left until another day when I’m not only feeling 100% but also have more time to spend on it. However, I’m writing it today, and that’s that.

I’ve been seeing some tweets and links about the ACTA and not really knowing what this was, I Googled and read stuff and have come to learn a little about it. I say ‘a little’ because I really do mean a little. I do not, in any way shape or form, claim to have extensive knowledge on this subject. I’ve read just a few articles and the like, giving me a rough background knowledge on the matter, but from what I can gather, it all makes sense, and by making sense, I mean; inevitable.

Hmm. Where to start….

Some years ago, during my BA, we had to read the book The World is Flat, by Thomas Friedman. In a nutshell, one of the main points is that the internet has levelled the playing field in terms of commerce; everyone has an equal opportunity. I didn’t really believe this then, and I still don’t now. I don’t see the world as ‘flat’. It’s definitely smaller, yes, but flat; no. Maybe we can see it as a kind of world within the physical world; a virtual world , smaller and faster than the one we live, breath and eat in, but very much there, and very much active.

So we have our virtual world. Actually, we’ve had our virtual world for years now, and day by day, it swells and swells, with more people joining through ease of access and greater understanding. So much of our life is online it’s hard sometimes to know where to draw the link. The post I wrote about Seppukoo only demonstrates how merged our online lives have become. Indeed, people are hesitent to use the acronym ‘IRL’ when talking about their ‘physical’ life, as online lives are now just as ‘real’ as ‘physical’ ones. ‘AFK’ seems to be a good one to use so far (away from keyboard). It’s fascinating this shift in our lives. This merging of what was once a pure sci-fi virtual world, with our normal everyday lives is completely new and has brought, and is bringing, about changes we’ve never seen, and no real idea what to do with. It presented a kind of utopia; a fully democratic world where one could let go of all your insecurities and create a new ‘you’ online. Who cared what race, colour, religion or sex you were? What does it matter? Suddenly you could access texts, music, films, what-have-you, previously unavailable to you (whether that be due to cost, distance, social status and so on); you could create things, or get people to help you; you could look up information and join chat rooms safe in the knowledge that everyone there was for the same purpose, held the same beliefs, and believed in the democratising, community spirit of the internet, and we were all, for a while, frolicking in blissful technological ignorance.

This recent poll for the BBC World Service shows how incredibly quickly we’ve grown accustomed to the internet, showing that almost 4 out of 5 people believe that access to the internet is a fundamental right Dr Hamadoun Toure, secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), told the BBC News that governments must “regard the internet as basic infrastructure – just like roads, waste and water“, and that, “We have entered the knowledge society and everyone must have access to participate.” This fundamental access has become so widespread that we are able to, and perhaps need to, map the world in terms of social networks (I’m going to use social networks as a point of reference a lot in this blog post, mostly because it’s what everyone uses the internet for – mostly). Everyone has heard the ‘if Facebook were a country it’d be bigger than the US’ line, but here is a world map showing what countries use which social networks, just to get a clearer picture (just use the link or click on the picture, and the clearer picture will be much clearer):

Wow. A lot of people use Facebook. But then we knew that right? So my point with this map and the fundamental right thing is that we’re now at the point where we use a ‘real’ world map to map out our usage of our fundamental right of our other (real?) world. So where’s the difference? We’re at the point where the internet, our online lives and our AFK lives have all merged in to one. They are all so interconnected, that the lines are sometimes extremely blurry, and it’s easy to lose track and get confused over what’s right or wrong where, and what should be or shouldn’t be OK. A little example of this would be the arguement of people doing jobs for free, thereby robbing someone who had trained for the job, of their wages. Fair? Most people tend to think not. But crowdsourcing? That’s OK. You can do anything through crowdsourcing, giving people who would never had had a chance, the opportunity to get their ideas heard, while simultaneously ‘cheating’ trained professionals. What’s right? I don’t know. I love that every person has their shot, but I would hate to be replaced by crowdsourcing.

The Copenhagen Institues for Future Studies published this report, Anarconomy, which argues that “All purely digital products will become free, and physical products that can be digitally produced won’t cost more than the raw materials. The commercial products of the future will be unique products, services and experiences – and the raw materials from which they are made of – and company/customer relationships.” This arguement came back to me as I watched Henrik Moltke on DR2, explaining ACTA, and why he loves and believes in the slight anarchistic aspect the internet has. I too love this aspect. It is an incredible thing, and there is not enough space or time to go in to all the benefits the internet has given people, suffice to say it is liberating in the extreme. Perhaps a little too liberating sometimes.

As the internet grew and as it continues to grow, as is with any form of society, bad elements either enter, or are born. This is a sad, inevitable fact. There exist countless cases of internet abuse, and by that I mean people using the internet for bad things, be it to lure in an unsuspecting child for some terrible abuse, or to plan a terrorist attack, or ‘lighter’ things, such as fraud, cheating, bullying, lying and the like. It’s not only ‘us’ the people who do this either; everyone does, from huge corporations, to everyday dicks through eBay. You could even put VisitDenmark in there, with all the uproar over ‘Danish Mother Seeking‘. The same survey from the BBC shows that the aspect of the internet that causes most concern is fraud, closely followed by violent and explict content. State censorship of content comes really quite low on the scale, and given that Facebook recently requested government data so it can remove sex offenders, I’m not surprised, as who wants sex offenders on Facebook?

Let’s sum it up by saying basically, all the bad stuff that happens AFK, happens online. Our world is no longer the hollow illuminated globe we have spinning in the corner, it is a globe that contains a smaller, faster, more accessible world inside it. This speed and accesability made it once a virtual utopica, where everyone was equal, where anyone could join, and where no one was judged. But this speed and accessibility has also proved, or is proving to be, the downfall of our utopia. As numbers grew, and the full extent of what the internet was capable of (not that we’re anywhere close) was realised by the great masses of people, the inevitable bad guys also joined in, turning many aspects of the internet upside down, proving that, just as when AFK, life ain’t simple. We will never live in a true democracy. We’ll never live in a idealic anarchic society. There is some kind of tipping point, when the bad people realise the benefits and the powerful realise the potential, and when that happens, the rest of us need help.

Although the internet might still be virtual, it is a virtual world, in ever sense. I wish it were a world where everyone was equal, where full democracy reigned, where everyone respected everyone because this was our chance to get away from The Man, and be free! It might have been, once, but…not so much anymore. As with anything that reaches a certain size, laws will be made, powers will enter the playing field, and the once free-for-all utopia becomes just another place.

We use real world maps to measure virtual world networks, and our AFK lives and our online lives as as important as each other, so why are we surprised and angry at the ACTA? I don’t like the idea of my internet usage being monitored, or the prospect of being fined millions of pounds for downloading, but at the same time, I think I’d be OK with some sort of regulation. Some kind of safety. I download now, but if there was a sure way I’d be caught, I’d bite the bullet and stop. I’m not saying that I think the ACTA is completely free of wrong, and is being handled in a wonderful manner (anything but), but I am for some kind of regulation. I do believe that just as anarchy would get out of control AFK, it will too online.

And no, I didn’t pay for the cartoon.

Comments {3}